Thought this list may find this article interesting...

[bradmcmahon at gmail.com (Bradley McMahon)]

I am not a lawyer:
I wonder if under the contract they specify if the equipment is not part of
the car or ownership for doesn't include certain items inside the car.
Otherwise they will have a really hard time arguing that the person who owns
the car doesn't legally own the equipment in the car. And thus they can
modify or remove the equipment without risk of legal action.


-Brad



On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Michael Salmon <lonestarr13 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Is that legal for the dealership to install this equipment on cars sold
> without informing the customer?  I don't want my dealer tracking my car.  I
> guess technically the bank owns the cars that will need to be repossesed and
> I'm sure they agreed to this. After the person pays the car off I wonder if
> they could have the dealer remove the equipment (if they even know about
> it).
> I wonder what trouble an owner could get into for removing or modify the
> equipment?
>
> On Mar 17, 2010 10:46 PM, "Josh Ciceraro" <josh.ciceraro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35919648/ns/technology_and_science-security/
>
> --
> kaizoku Josh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100322/e8bca4e3/attachment.htm