Nessus vs McAfee Vulnerability Management

[strandjs at gmail.com (John Strand)]

Wow...

Talk about coming to the right place.

First, look at credentialed scans.  Not only can they look for
vulnerabilites, but they check configuration compliance.

Now I play the "Summon Paul +5" card.



On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, subzer0girl <subzer0girl at gmail.com> wrote:

> I need a little help convincing the purchasing people that I need Nessus.
> They are suggesting McAfee Vulnerability Management is a viable
> alternative.  I want to stick with Nessus since that is what I have
> experience with.  I've googled for a comparison of the two products but
> haven't found anything of value. Does anyone have experience with how the
> two products compare ?
>
> Any help would be appreciated
>
> Sandy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100310/fe06c4ff/attachment.htm