PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Usable Stego
From: joel.folkerts at gmail.com (Joel Folkerts)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:52:36 -0500
Point taken but there are safeguards to ensure that the data hidden by steg cannot be easily detected, i.e. encrypting the steg payload. While this introduces a whole new set of issues, it doesn't mean that we cannot adopt a stego "standard" to transfer data. "The path to hell is paved with good intentions." On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Grymoire <pauldotcom at grymoire.com> wrote:
I believe the primary reason for this may be the lack of an agreed industry standard, protocol, or application that implements steg.This would be an oxymoron. If it's well documented, standardized, or understood, then it isn't very good stego, IMHO. After all, if you can detect it, it has already failed i's primary purpose. There are commerical stego packages used in Photoshop/Elements. There is the Digimark watermark plug-in for example. It can detect and insert watermarks in a photo. _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20090810/4eeeda69/attachment.htm
Current thread:
- Usable Stego, (continued)
- Usable Stego Karl Schuttler (Aug 08)
- Usable Stego Joel Folkerts (Aug 08)
- Usable Stego John Navarro (Aug 08)
- Usable Stego Jim Halfpenny (Aug 09)
- Usable Stego Ali Emirlioglu (Aug 09)
- Usable Stego Jim Halfpenny (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego Shane Kelly (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego Michael Miller (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego Chris Biettchert (Aug 12)
- Usable Stego Grymoire (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego Joel Folkerts (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego Michael Miller (Aug 10)
- Usable Stego bytes abit (Aug 13)
- Usable Stego Joel Folkerts (Aug 10)