oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961)
From: Eddie Chapman <eddie () ehuk net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:10:58 +0100
On 09/10/18 14:58, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
Because nautilus will automatically invokeevince-thumbnailer without any user-interaction, just browsing a website is enough to trigger the vulnerability in some common configurations.
While the vulnerability in ghostscript itself is clear in this thread, does anyone have any more info on the above aspect of this? i.e is the above scenario (inadvertently running postscript, perhaps contained in an image, through ghostscript by just browsing a malicious site) limited to just nautilus in gnome environments? Do other browsers/environments handle this better or do they do similar? It seems that, strictly speaking, the "critical" nature of this vulnerability hinges on the behaviour of the browser/desktop environment. Otherwise the scope is limited to an individual manually downloading a postscript file and opening it outside of the browser.
Apologies if I'm missing anything obvious or if this has been covered elsewhere online.
Current thread:
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961), (continued)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Bob Friesenhahn (Oct 09)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Perry E. Metzger (Oct 09)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Tavis Ormandy (Oct 09)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Alex Gaynor (Oct 09)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Doran Moppert (Oct 09)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Perry E. Metzger (Oct 10)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Rich Felker (Oct 16)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Rich Felker (Oct 17)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Hanno Böck (Oct 10)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Eddie Chapman (Oct 10)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Hanno Böck (Oct 10)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (Oct 11)
- Re: ghostscript: bypassing executeonly to escape -dSAFER sandbox (CVE-2018-17961) Brandon Perry (Oct 10)