oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash
From: Jeff Law <law () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:33:59 -0600
On 06/20/2017 12:44 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
I think it's also worth mentioning the segmented stack support in GCC and LLVM that was added for Go. It's possible to use it for C with the __morestack call set up to simply abort when stack space is exhausted. That's what Rust was doing after it dropped segmented stacks, but they wanted to move to stack probes for efficiency and prematurely dropped these function prelude checks. It's not efficient, but it works, unlike -fstack-check. I don't think it makes sense for general purpose distributions to adopt it but it's an available option for others with more concern about this issue.
Yup. go's split-stacks are another option. As you mention, probably not performant enough for a general purpose distribution, but could be interesting for more specialized needs. jeff
Current thread:
- Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Jeff Law (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Daniel Micay (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Jeff Law (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Daniel Micay (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Jeff Law (Jun 21)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Daniel Micay (Jun 21)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Szabolcs Nagy (Jun 23)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Jeff Law (Jun 19)
- Re: Re: Qualys Security Advisor -- The Stack Clash Daniel Micay (Jun 19)