oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: MITRE is adding data intake to its CVE ID process


From: Raphael Geissert <geissert () debian org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:03:24 +0100

Hi,

On 12 February 2017 at 00:35, Solar Designer <solar () openwall com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:59:27PM -0500, cve-assign () mitre org wrote:
C5. I want MITRE to send the https://cveform.mitre.org form data, and
the CVE ID, to the oss-security list at the same time that these are
sent to the requester.

R5. We have had internal discussions within MITRE about this. We are
able to implement this easily if the community requires this approach.
At the moment, we are expecting the requester to resend this
information to oss-security once they accept their CVE ID assignment.
[...]
MITRE - can you please implement that, and we'll see how it goes and
whether we need it adjusted or possibly discontinued if things go wrong
or if there's opposition (so far, there's almost none)?

Please see http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/09/26
for an example.

This is also an example of how the change breaks threading.  First,
there was a thread about the issue on the list.  Then there was CVE
request and assignment off-list.  And then there's this new thread on
the CVE assignment.

If this was to be implemented, the submitter could also just include
the message-id of the related oss-sec post.
The mail by MITRE could then set a In-Reply-To accordingly to avoid
thread breaking.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net


Current thread: