oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:07:26 -0700
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Justin Steven <justin () justinsteven com> wrote:
As I understand, it is indeed DWF which I believe is a bona fide CNA.
Indeed it is https://cve.mitre.org/cve/cna.html
See <https://github.com/distributedweaknessfiling/DWF- Database/blob/master/DWF-Database-2016.csv> Do these allcoations (as well as the 2015 and 2017 allocations) need to be pushed upstream and synced with Mitre's dataset? -- Justin
Yes, but we're in the process of creating a JSON data format and finalizing it (already on v.4, rapid iteration for the win), once that is done (hopefully another month or so to nail it down) the DWF will start to publish data in that format so MITRE can consume it and as time goes on the DWF will ramp up (there's a lot to do if you want to build a system that will assign a few hundred thousand CVEs efficiently =). We'll be making some announcements at RSA in 2 weeks. -- -- Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert () redhat com
Current thread:
- curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Vladis Dronov (Feb 02)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Marcus Meissner (Feb 02)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Justin Steven (Feb 03)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Kurt Seifried (Feb 03)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Vladis Dronov (Feb 03)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Justin Steven (Feb 03)
- Re: curiosity for CVE-2016-10000 Marcus Meissner (Feb 02)