oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: membership request to the closed linux-distros security mailing list


From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 01:09:39 -0400

On 02/04/15 07:43 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:00:29PM +0100, Sona Sarmadi wrote:
On behalf of Enea  Software AB, I would like to request membership to
the closed linux-distros security mailing list.

Speaking strictly for myself, I'm still somewhat skeptical; the security
announce archives http://mail.lists.enea.com/pipermail/security-announce/
do show some security updates, but (guessing) 15% of the actual patch
links I tried to follow no longer exist.

Furthermore, the advisories all suggest downloading patches via http and
offer no mechanism to validate the patches before applying them. Consider
this recent advisory:
http://mail.lists.enea.com/pipermail/security-announce/20150326/000064.html

- there's no gpg signature on this advisory
- there's no cryptographic checksums in the advisory to authenticate
  the patch even if the advisory were signed
- there's no ascii-armored signatures in the patches
- there's no detached signatures at
  http://linux.enea.com/5.0-beta-m400/patches/
  or at
  http://linux.enea.com/4.0/patches/

If downloading patches and applying them by hand is really the
distribution model Enea has chosen, then it feels like the provenance
of updates is seriously lacking.

In my opinion, until some more of the security basics are covered,
joining linux-distros@ is premature.

I guess Ubuntu has to be dropped from the linux-distros then, because
www.ubuntu.com appears to be http-only and the ISO download is entirely
insecure. The security notices are also served insecurely there:

http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/

Am I missing something... ? It doesn't make much sense to criticize this
when you folks are doing the same. I do get the impression that Enea
Linux is handling security poorly (where are all of the other issues?)
but this bothered me.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: