oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: strings / libbfd crasher
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () coredump cx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:31:28 -0700
[+Tavis]
I don't understand the user benefit of extracting strings only from certain sections of executables, and I almost feel like it's a side effect of strings being a part of binutils more than anything else.I fully agree. I wasn't aware strings does any kind of executable parsing and I was very surprised that there is any attack vector at all against it at all.
Tavis mentioned to me some time ago that he made that suggestion upstream when he bumped into other issues many years ago; he can probably comment on how that went, but more generally, distro vendors have some latitude to apply non-upstream patches to change the default behavior... maybe that's the way to go. /mz
Current thread:
- strings / libbfd crasher Hanno Böck (Oct 23)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Oct 23)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Dave Rutherford (Oct 23)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher mancha (Oct 23)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher mancha (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Hanno Böck (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Hanno Böck (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Tavis Ormandy (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher mancha (Oct 24)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Oct 23)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Hanno Böck (Oct 26)
- Re: strings / libbfd crasher cve-assign (Oct 30)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Alexander Cherepanov (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Hanno Böck (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Michal Zalewski (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Jann Horn (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: strings / libbfd crasher Alexander Cherepanov (Nov 04)