oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: heap overflow in procmail
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 01:05:38 -0600
Please for the love of whatever... well whatever you love, use the "Security" sensitive tag in our BZ or the "security" keyword so the Product Security Team sees it (otherwise we may not, I mean have you seen how many bugs get filed daily in our BZ?). On 04/09/14 12:01 AM, Michal Zalewski wrote:
It's been "widely public" for two months, right? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121299
-- Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- heap overflow in procmail Tavis Ormandy (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Kurt Seifried (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail cve-assign (Sep 03)
- RE: heap overflow in procmail Christey, Steven M. (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Michal Zalewski (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Kurt Seifried (Sep 04)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Kurt Seifried (Sep 04)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Kurt Seifried (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Rich Felker (Sep 03)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Tavis Ormandy (Sep 03)
- Re: Re: heap overflow in procmail Rich Felker (Sep 04)
- Re: Re: heap overflow in procmail Tavis Ormandy (Sep 04)
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Tavis Ormandy (Sep 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: heap overflow in procmail Jack Frosch (Sep 05)
- Re: Re: heap overflow in procmail Simon McVittie (Sep 05)