oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:26:53 +0200
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:19:43 -0400 Dan Rosenberg wrote:
Steve, it seems CVE-2011-1676 should get marked as rejected or disputed.I currently only have CVE-2011-1089, which seems to be for glibc not indicating failure of addmntent() calls. Were additional CVEs assigned to some of the individual issues? If so, would you mind posting them here to avoid duplicate requests?
CVE-2011-1675 - CVE-2011-1681 based on your list here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/4374/focus=4516 CVE-2011-1089 for similar nfs-utils: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/4954 -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Ludwig Nussel (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Tomas Hoger (Apr 27)
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Dan Rosenberg (Apr 27)
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Tomas Hoger (Apr 27)
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Dan Rosenberg (Apr 27)
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Tomas Hoger (Apr 27)
- Re: Suid mount helpers fail to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE Dan Rosenberg (Apr 27)