Re: patch for remote buffer overflows and local message spoofing in mipv6 daemon

[Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer () suse de>]

Its probably better to have two IDs, even though its unlikely
that they will be fixed separately. Its two issues at last.

Sebastian


On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:42:50AM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
> ----- "Sebastian Krahmer" <krahmer () suse de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried this 2 years ago on vendor-sec and with the maintainers at that
> > time w/o success. I polished the patch to fit in the current commit.  The
> > bugs were not fixed during the two years.  Can someone assign CVE(s)?
>
> Do you need two IDs? This message sounds like it, but I'm not completely
> sure.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 
>     JB

-- 
~
~ perl self.pl
~ $_='print"\$_=\47$_\47;eval"';eval
~ krahmer () suse de - SuSE Security Team
~ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)