oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: lxr
From: Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 13:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
----- "Henri Salo" <henri () nerv fi> wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010 09:31:16 -0400 Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg () gmail com> wrote:I discovered and reported this bug at the same time as two other XSS issues, including the one covered by CVE-2009-4497. While the commit may be a few days apart for some of these, I think they can safely fall under the same CVE, unless it's standard practice to assign CVEs for each of several related minor issues.Several XSS-vulnerabilities can have one CVE at least when those vulnerabilities are fixed at the same time.
In this instance, I would assign it a new ID, as the old one already exists and doesn't note both XSS fixes (it is possible someone fixed just the one XSS and not both in an update). I've CC'd Steve Christey, for a second opinion. Thanks -- JB
Current thread:
- CVE request: lxr Raphael Geissert (May 02)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Henri Salo (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Josh Bressers (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Henri Salo (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Henri Salo (May 03)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Steven M. Christey (May 06)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (May 06)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Josh Bressers (May 14)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (May 14)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Josh Bressers (May 14)
- Re: CVE request: lxr Dan Rosenberg (May 03)