oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw
From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel () suse de>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:56:16 +0100
Josh Bressers wrote:
As many of you have probably seen, there was a supposed Samba 0day flaw posted to full-disclosure and youtube. Samba has a response to this: http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126539387432412&w=2 I'm not sure if this should get a CVE id. It is documented behavior. Somewhat unexpected though. I think changing the default is the right way to go, but it may be more of a hardening measure than a security fix. Thoughts Steve?
Any update on this? I think unexpected insecure default configurations that surprise admins did get CVE numbers in the past. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.de/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
Current thread:
- Samba symlink 0day flaw Josh Bressers (Feb 05)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Nico Golde (Feb 05)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Michael Gilbert (Feb 05)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Simo Sorce (Feb 05)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Nico Golde (Feb 06)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Yves-Alexis Perez (Feb 06)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Nico Golde (Feb 07)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Nico Golde (Feb 05)
- Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw Steven M. Christey (Mar 05)