oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.*
From: Eugene Teo <eugene () redhat com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:40:20 +0800
Hi Steve,
One approach might be to "pre-tag" this whole set of changes with a single CVE, then when they ultimately get merged into a single kernel version or some other concrete milestone, the "scope" of that CVE ends.
I'm fine with this approach. It can actually help to make it easier to manage this set of changes. Thanks, Eugene
Current thread:
- CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Marcus Meissner (Apr 04)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 06)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Marcus Meissner (Apr 07)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 20)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Marcus Meissner (Apr 21)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 21)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Steven M. Christey (Apr 24)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 25)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* dann frazier (Apr 29)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Steven French (Apr 29)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* dann frazier (Apr 29)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 29)
- Update - Re: [oss-security] CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (May 13)
- Re: Update - Re: [oss-security] CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Jeff Layton (May 14)
- Re: Update - Re: [oss-security] CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Steven M. Christey (May 14)
- Re: Re: Update - Re: [oss-security] CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Marcus Meissner (May 15)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Marcus Meissner (Apr 07)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Eugene Teo (Apr 06)
- Re: CVE request? buffer overflow in CIFS in 2.6.* Mark J Cox (Apr 27)