Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy
From: nnposter <nnposter () users sourceforge net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:57:03 -0700
On 1/24/19 12:13 AM, David Fifield wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:06:07PM -0700, nnposter wrote:ncat ... --proxy-dns local | remote | both | none More at https://github.com/nmap/nmap/pull/1439 Please review the proposal and comment.curl uses different URL schemes to control whether name resolution is local or remote: https://curl.haxx.se/docs/manpage.html#-x socks4, socks5: local socks4a, socks5h: remote But personally I've never liked that setup. I almost always want remote resolution and have to remind myself not to use the versions that will leak DNS. And of course it doesn't work for http or https proxies.
I agree. It is definitely overloading the concept of a protocol. Back to my proposal, what would be your vote? (1) ignore; do nothing (2) proceed with it (3) the feature should be somehow supported but not this way Cheers, nnposter _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy destinations nnposter (Jan 22)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy destinations David Fifield (Jan 23)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy nnposter (Jan 25)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy David Fifield (Jan 25)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy nnposter (Jan 25)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy nnposter (Jan 25)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy destinations David Fifield (Jan 23)
- Re: [ncat][RFC] Ability to control hostname resolution for proxy nnposter (Feb 20)