Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: scanning issues??


From: Robin Wood <robin () digininja org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:33:13 +0100

Looks like you are missing the filename after the -oG, without it it takes
the next parameter as the filename so you probably have a file called
-g179.gnmap in your work directory.

Robin
On 25 Apr 2014 19:07, "Mike ." <dmciscobgp () hotmail com> wrote:

here is the output...someone explain this one to me please
C:\>nmap -max-retries1 -v -oG -g179 -n -P0 -T4 -p179 208.107.0.1/6 | grep
"Discovered open port"
and the outbound traffic generated (notice the port being scanned is NOT
179 like it should)


4) 192.168.0.16.179 > 208.0.0.61.445: S, cksum 0x9d47 (correct),
519783550:519783550(0) win 1024 <mss 1460>IP (tos 0x0, ttl  53, id 50325,
offset 0, flags [none], proto: TCP (6), length:44) 192.168.0.16.179 >
208.0.0.62.445: S, cksum 0x9d46 (correct), 519783550:519783550(0) win 1024
<mss 1460>IP (tos 0x0, ttl  43, id 26451, offset 0, flags [none], proto:
TCP (6), length:44) 192.168.0.16.179 > 208.0.0.63.445: S, cksum 0x9d45
(correct), 519783550:519783550(0) win 1024 <mss 1460>
( i notice all is well, however, if i omit the -oG option. why is that?)
what did i do wrong, if anything?
m|ke
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: