Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock.
From: Henri Doreau <henri.doreau () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:35:07 +0100
2012/1/23 Luis MartinGarcia. <luis.mgarc () gmail com>:
Hi Henri, I am glad to see that the nsock engines branch got merged. About your question, from Nping's perspective, it would be great to know the maximum number of fds that nsock can handle simultaneously. I do not expect to be able to determine the max number of sockets per nsock pool. I honestly don't see how that could be implemented. For me, having access to the per-process limit, is fine. In practical terms, Nping needs that information to determine when to stop requesting new sockets and start reusing existing ones. About when to implement the feature, it is up to you. This is certainly not critical, so there is no hurry at all. Thanks a lot! Best regards,
Ok, I get it, I'll give an implementation a shot when time permits. Regards. -- Henri _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Henri Doreau (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Luis MartinGarcia. (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Henri Doreau (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Luis MartinGarcia. (Jan 23)