Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock.
From: "Luis MartinGarcia." <luis.mgarc () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:45:04 +0100
On 01/23/2012 08:30 PM, Henri Doreau wrote:
Hi Luis, 2011/12/19 Luis MartinGarcia. <luis.mgarc () gmail com>:I'm going to add a new item to Nping's to-do list so I can look into this again the day the nsock-engines branch gets merged.nsock-engines has now been merged[1]. So what would be the best API? A nsock function that returns the maximum number of fds each nsock_pool can handle? This, combined with libnetutil::get_max_open_descriptors() should let applications know how many fds can still be opened. What about postponing this until the stable branch is created though? What do you think?
Hi Henri, I am glad to see that the nsock engines branch got merged. About your question, from Nping's perspective, it would be great to know the maximum number of fds that nsock can handle simultaneously. I do not expect to be able to determine the max number of sockets per nsock pool. I honestly don't see how that could be implemented. For me, having access to the per-process limit, is fine. In practical terms, Nping needs that information to determine when to stop requesting new sockets and start reusing existing ones. About when to implement the feature, it is up to you. This is certainly not critical, so there is no hurry at all. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Luis MartinGarcia. _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Henri Doreau (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Luis MartinGarcia. (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Henri Doreau (Jan 23)
- Re: get_max_open_descriptors() is more generous than Nsock. Luis MartinGarcia. (Jan 23)