Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: http-enum signatures BIG update
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:09:51 -0500
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:08:10 -0500 Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com> wrote:
Given how long http-enum takes to run (in my experience), any reduction in the number of probes is helpful.
http pipelining should speed that up, but for some reason pipelining doesn't seem to be working properly (at all?) lately. Maybe it'd be worth looking into some parallelization (preferably in the http library itself, not in http-enum, since http-enum uses the pipelining functions). Ron _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- http-enum signatures BIG update Paulino Calderon (Jul 01)
- Re: http-enum signatures BIG update Daniel Miller (Jul 01)
- Re: http-enum signatures BIG update Ron (Jul 01)
- Re: http-enum signatures BIG update Paulino Calderon (Jul 01)
- Re: http-enum signatures BIG update Fyodor (Jul 01)
- Re: http-enum signatures BIG update Daniel Miller (Jul 01)