Re: error semantics of faulty dependencies

[Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>]

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:20 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
> I can summarize it thus:
> Strong dependencies: dependencies must exist and be run.
> Ron: dependencies must exist, whether or not they are run.
> Current situation: dependencies need not exist nor be run.

So do we want to change to the "Ron dependencies" (I'm fine with the
name btw ;)?

-- 
- Patrick Donnelly
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/