Re: status report #6 of 15

[kirubakaran S <kirubakaran1989 () gmail com>]

Hello,



> I don't think we should inclue "License" for two reasons:
>
> 1) The license doesn't really matter for people USING the scripts.
>   Everyone is allowed to use it.  The license only matters for people
>   who redistribute scripts, and such people can get the information
>   from reading the source or the NSEDoc.
>
> 2) All 128 scripts have exactly the same license text anyway.
>
> The "Author" field is a a tougher choice.  It is not very relevant to
> the Zenmap user either, but I can also see some arguments for keeping
> it.  Overall though, I think I'd rather see the Author field in the
> script source and the NSEDoc (as is the case now), but not in the
> Zenmap interface itself.
>
> Okay, This is the prototype of script selection interface.
I will see to that license fields and author are not included
in zenmap interface itself.
Thanks for your suggestion!
-- 
cheers
Kirubakaran.S
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/