Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Ncrack suggestion.
From: Richard Miles <richard.k.miles () googlemail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:48:12 -0500
Hello ithilgore. I downloaded the last version from SVN and the problem continue. Also, on the SVN version the option -iL doesn't work (appear to be a bug, because on ALPHA it works) and the brute forcing over SSH also is much more slow on the SVN version in comparison with ALPHA version. I hope this helps. Thank you On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:40 AM, ithilgore <ithilgore.ryu.l () gmail com>wrote:
On 03/29/10 04:21, Richard Miles wrote:Fyodor, just as a follow up, I added 1GB more of memory in my VM and the problem persist. Now it consumed > 1.2GB. ThanksRichard, I assume you are using the latest SVN version of Ncrack, right? I had fixed many known memory leaks after the "official" 0.01ALPHA release, so in case you are using that old version, it would be great if you could try the newest one and tell us if the problem persists there too. -- ithilgore
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Ncrack suggestion., (continued)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 25)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Fyodor (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Fyodor (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 29)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 29)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 25)