Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Ncrack suggestion.
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:01:24 -0700
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 03:44:04PM -0500, Richard Miles wrote:
Hi! I found the problem. The linux kernel is killing Ncrack because it start to eat so much memory, when it arrives near to 97% the linux kernel kill Ncrack process to keep the Linux integrity. I confirmed it looking at top command, it start with a few memory allocated, but in a few minutes it start to eat, eat and eat more memory and never release it.
Thanks for the report. How much RAM does your machine have? How high did Ncrack get to before it was killed? Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 25)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 25)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 25)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 27)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Fyodor (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Fyodor (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 28)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 29)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 29)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. Richard Miles (Mar 25)
- Re: Ncrack suggestion. ithilgore (Mar 25)