Re: Why the "Linux goofiness" socket writability check?

[Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/18/2009 10:15 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> Fyodor didn't remember what this code was for but it dates back to 2000
> at least. (There was a problem with the permissions in the Subversion
> repository, but Fyodor changed it and now you can see log messages going
> back further.) We decided to remove it and see if it causes problems. It
> is removed in r14426.

Upon first glance, the code starting around line 3692 of scan_engine.cc in
trunk contains the same logic (same comment anyway).  Just missed?

> David Fifield

Cheers,
Kris Katterjohn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=HHBX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org