Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!]
From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:41:00 -0500
David Fifield wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Sven Klemm wrote:
>
What happens if the parity check fails? Some kind of catchable error ("OpenSSL error")? David Fifield
I think it should be an optional error, too, because when I calculate the key by hand, I'm not even calculating the parity bits, just making room for them.
Ron _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 04)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 05)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] David Fifield (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] David Fifield (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 07)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Sven Klemm (Oct 06)
- Re: [NSE + NSELib] Netbios and SMB [stable!] Ron (Oct 05)