Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap and IPv6
From: "DePriest, Jason R." <jrdepriest () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:42:25 -0500
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Kris Katterjohn <> wrote:
Dunno, but here is a more informative error messge. CONN (0.2710s) TCP localhost > fe80::210:5aff:fe1d:5c3f:22 => Invalid argument I did a fancier scan and ended up with 2000 of those. depriest@hole:~$ grep "Invalid argument" nmap-ipv6.nmap | wc -l 2000 I am attaching the log file for someone who knows more about nmap -6 to look at.I think you just need to specify the interface to use via the perfect syntax (see below). This is required because link-local addresses are interface-specific. I added support for this syntax for link-local scanning in Nmap this past May: o Nmap now understands the RFC 4007 percent syntax for IPv6 Zone IDs. On Windows, this ID has to be a numeric index. On Linux and some other OS's, this ID can instead be an interface name. Some examples of this syntax: fe80::20f:b0ff:fec6:15af%2 fe80::20f:b0ff:fec6:15af%eth0 [Kris] If you haven't already seen it, you may be interested in HD Moore's recent paper[1] on IPv6, which also happens to mention the above support in Nmap.Thanks in advance folks. -JasonThanks, Kris Katterjohn [1] http://www.milw0rm.com/papers/233
You are correct. I have used the %{number} format in Windows XP but didn't know how to tell Linux the same thing. %{interface} is good to know. I am dumb. But I ask questions. -Jason _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Nmap and IPv6 DePriest, Jason R. (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 Kris Katterjohn (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 DePriest, Jason R. (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 Kris Katterjohn (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 DePriest, Jason R. (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 DePriest, Jason R. (Oct 17)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 GomoR (Oct 19)
- Re: Nmap and IPv6 Kris Katterjohn (Oct 17)