Re: -PN reason, localhost isn't really responding

[Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fyodor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:36:32AM -0400, Michael Pattrick wrote:
> > I'm thinking about adding something along the lines of 'user-set' or
> > 'user-specified', but I would like to get some opinions on this., any
> > thoughts on a better name?
>
> One option would be "not-tested".  "user-set" sounds fine too, IMHO.

I like "assumed" or "skipped", but I too agree that the "user-set" alternative
is OK as well.

> Cheers,
> -F

Thanks,
Kris Katterjohn

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=lfa1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org