Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please)
From: "Patrick Donnelly" <batrick.donnelly () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:26:22 -0600
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:01 AM, jah <jah () zadkiel plus com> wrote:
Thanks for that. With this in mind then, if I want to lock an object other than "id" using nmap.mutex (allowing threads to run until they reach a point where they need to use that object) then that object will need to be one which is shared by all threads and thus available in either nmap.registry or _G. Is that correct?
Yes. Cheers, -- -Patrick Donnelly "One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say." -Will Durant _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please), (continued)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) David Fifield (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Kris Katterjohn (Jun 03)
- RE: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Thomas Buchanan (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 03)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 07)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) jah (Jun 08)
- Re: [NSE] Large recode for nse_main (test please) Patrick Donnelly (Jun 08)