Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ambiguity about nmap results
From: Brandon Enright <bmenrigh () ucsd edu>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:02:09 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:22:46 +0300 "sara fink" <sara.fink () gmail com> wrote:
on my laptop I have nmap version 4.60 from gentoo portage. 4.62 appears as non stable in portage.
The Gentoo arch/~arch model (as well as most other distributions notion of stable/unstable) typically doesn't match the Nmap development cycle. For Nmap it is generally the case that x.z is /more/ stable and better tested than x.y when z > y. At least for nmap, you probably should add # Networking (or ~x86, etc) net-analyzer/nmap ~amd64 to /etc/portage/package.keywords I love Gentoo but don't expect the devs and package maintainers to make the best decisions for your particular usage case. Brandon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhAXUgACgkQqaGPzAsl94LR8ACeOTZjoZZT2YJHN2uFfJCWQipz um0AoIpj0tyw04uMtA5rFDFTqOBROzlV =aZs7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Thomas Tavaris J (Tavaris) (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Rob Nicholls (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Brandon Enright (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Kris Katterjohn (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results doug (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results bensonk (May 31)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results doug (May 31)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Aaron Leininger (May 31)