Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: ambiguity about nmap results
From: "Mike pattrick" <mpattrick () rhinovirus org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:11:10 -0400
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, sara fink <sara.fink () gmail com> wrote:
I tried to use nmap from this web site: http://www.nmapyourself.com/.
As this is a third party website, it would probably be more fruitful to contact them, I don't think anyone on this list is responsible for the creation or maintenance of that site.
If I try to run nmap on my external ip say at range 1-1024 with flag -sT I get
I tried that website out and the results were completely erroneous! It should also be pointed out that they are using Nmap v4.20 - a very old version. On the computer you scanned, are all 1000 ports really open? or was that a bad result too? Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Thomas Tavaris J (Tavaris) (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- RE: ambiguity about nmap results Rob Nicholls (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Mike pattrick (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results Brandon Enright (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results sara fink (May 30)
- Re: ambiguity about nmap results DePriest, Jason R. (May 30)