Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Time to lose gen1 OS detection?


From: "Justin Knox" <knox.justin () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:30:11 -0400

Touché

to the point: if I were in a position where I could use nmap on the
networks I support without fear of retribution from further up the
food chain...I would be submitting plenty more service and OS
fingerprints :)

unfortunately, that is not the case in my current position... and a
topic for another thread.

Either way: good point.
--J
On 10/29/07, kx <kxmail () gmail com> wrote:
Just to add another side to the thread...

If we dropped gen1 now, gen2 is the only option.

Would that maybe nudge more folks to turn in gen2 submissions, thus
addressing the gap?

Also, for those who says they have old boxes that aren't in gen2, I
gotta ask, why haven't you turned in a submission? =)

Cheers,
kx



On 10/29/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
1st generation Nmap OS detection had a great run, lasting 9 years.
But now that the 2nd generation DB has grown considerably, it may be
about time to let gen1 OS detection go.  It complicates the code, and
the gen1 DB itself takes up more than 800K of space.

Then gen2 system still only has 827 fingerprints compared to 1684 in
gen1.  But the new system has better fingerprints, and for more recent
and relevant system.

So gen1 OS detection will probably be gone in the next release unless
I hear from people who can demonstrate good reasons for it to stay.
If you scan large networks and find that -O1 still works better than
-O2, that's the sort of thing we'd like to hear.

Cheers,
-F

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org


Current thread: