Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business
From: "DePriest, Jason R." <jrdepriest () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:51:34 -0500
On 8/30/07, Ric Anderson <> wrote: - - - - cut - - - -
Starting Nmap 4.22SOC2 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-08-30 07:23 US Mountain Standard Time
- - - - cut - - - -
Fyodor wrote
- - - - cut - - - -
Will you please try with Nmap 4.22SOC6, which you can now find on the Nmap download page? Be sure to specify "yes" if it asks you about installing the newer WinPcap which it comes with. Then try again from an admin window and let us know how it goes.
- - - - cut - - - - 4.22SOC6 is the latest. How did you end up with 4.22SOC2 instead? I don't know if it really makes a difference for your issue, but it's still very odd. Are you behind a caching proxy server? -Jason _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Ric Anderson (Aug 29)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Fyodor (Aug 29)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Ric Anderson (Aug 30)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business DePriest, Jason R. (Aug 30)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business DePriest, Jason R. (Aug 30)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Ric Anderson (Aug 30)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Ric Anderson (Aug 30)
- Re: Odd nmap behavior under Windows Vista Business Fyodor (Aug 29)