Re: implementing nmap in python

[Max <nmap () webwizarddesign com>]

I have been waiting to see if there was a need / desire for a library
like Nmap::Scanner in other languages, was thinking of ruby and python
as targets nearly two years ago, now that I am hearing there is some
interest in that I will port my library to python and ruby, your
choice of course whether you wish to use it or not :), seems the Umit
crowd has no love for Nmap::Scanner :p, which is fine and a choice I
am ok with of course.

- Max

On 8/28/07, Guilherme Polo <ggpolo () gmail com> wrote:
> 2007/8/28, Giorgio Zoppi <giorgio.zoppi () gmail com>:
> > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 11:15 -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> > > 2007/8/28, Giorgio Zoppi <giorgio.zoppi () gmail com>:
> > > > On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 17:09 -0300, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> > > > > 2007/8/26, Julius Kuhn <julikr678 () gmail com>:
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am currently working on a python program. I mean its basically a shell and
> > > > > > im trying to use nmap to portscan a host. I just wanted to know if there is
> > > > > > an easy way to implement it other then os.system etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't use os.system, use subprocess.
> > > > >
> > > > > > otherwise i would have
> > > > > > to write my own portscanner. Thanks ..
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't believe this reason you are pointing is good enough to make a
> > > > > new portscanner.
> > > > > If you wish to do something like import nmap; nmap.scan(something) and
> > > > > etc, you will need to create a set of nmap bindings for Python, and
> > > > > that will be easier than creating a new portscanner that equals to
> > > > > nmap.
> > > > In order to do something similar, it will be useful a libnmap written in
> > > > C,
> > >
> > > Good proposal right there. It doesn't need to be in C, C++ would be
> > > possible too.
> >
> > Now, i'm doing my master thesis, so i've no time :).
> > > > so still your gui it will avoid to start on more process to scan
> > > > hosts.
> > >
> > > I didn't understand this. Are you talking about performance ?
> >
> > Yes. I suppose that your code does some fork+execv in order to start
> > scanning isn't it?  With a libnmap, your gui will need only to register
> > an event or a callback, in order to get scan results.
>
> Using subprocess that will happen, yes. A callback would be much
> better, but what is better is to not rely on OS spawning a new process
> like that, so many things could go wrong...
>
> But I believe that question wasn't to me, since I didn't start this thread.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Giorgio.
>
>
> --
> -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org