Nmap Development mailing list archives
hosts found/not found based on number of IP addresses scanned
From: Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel () tbdnetworks com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:52:05 -0700
Hello, I'm running nmap scans in my local network for IOS routers/switches and based on the IP address ranges specified, some machines are detected or not detected. I keep all other parameters identical. I also tried to specify e.g. --min-hostgroup and --minimal-rtt-timeout, but nothing seems to really do the trick. # nmap -P0 -PU161 -PS22,23 -p T:22,23,U:161 -sT -sU 192.168.4.240-255 Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-06-06 19:41 PDT Nmap finished: 16 IP addresses (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.445 seconds # nmap -P0 -PU161 -PS22,23 -p T:22,23,U:161 -sT -sU 192.168.4.250-255 Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-06-06 19:41 PDT Interesting ports on 192.168.4.252: PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp closed ssh 23/tcp open telnet 161/udp open|filtered snmp MAC Address: 00:10:7B:E8:5C:25 (Cisco Systems) Nmap finished: 6 IP addresses (1 host up) scanned in 0.694 seconds nmap is running on Linux 2.6.21.3 x86 (Debian unstable), but I got the same results with Nmap 4.11 on Linux 2.6.18-4 amd64 (Debian stable) Best, Norbert
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- hosts found/not found based on number of IP addresses scanned Norbert Kiesel (Jun 06)
- Re: hosts found/not found based on number of IP addresses scanned Brandon Enright (Jun 07)
- Re: hosts found/not found based on number of IP addresses scanned Norbert Kiesel (Jun 07)
- Re: hosts found/not found based on number of IP addresses scanned Brandon Enright (Jun 07)