Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark

["Hans Nilsson" <hasse_gg () ftml net>]

That looks quite interesting. However I just tried it against a box I
know have a firewall running on one port and it didn't detect it. It
should also look at the IPID and perhaps the window size. The IPID is
often a dead giveaway.


On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:15:49 +0000, "DePriest, Jason R."
<jrdepriest () gmail com> said:
> On 12/28/06, Sina Bahram  wrote:
> > I am using nmap 4.21 alpha 1, which I believe is the latest version of nmap
> > released.
> >
> > I don't have a nmap -sQ option
> >
> > Is this something I am totally missing?
> >
> > I don't even remember this option ever being introduced.
> >
> > It sounds extremely useful.
> >
> > Take care,
> > Sina
>
> Theory - http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q3/att-0282/QSCAN
>
> But I can only find this patch against 4.20ALPHA4 -
> http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q3/0282.html
>
> Did it not get included in the final 4.20?
>
> -Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org
-- 
  Hans Nilsson
  hasse_gg () ftml net

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org