Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark
From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram () nc rr com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:06:58 -0500
I am using nmap 4.21 alpha 1, which I believe is the latest version of nmap released. I don't have a nmap -sQ option Is this something I am totally missing? I don't even remember this option ever being introduced. It sounds extremely useful. Take care, Sina -----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 10:20 PM To: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 GomoR wrote:
I told the author to re-test using latest Nmap, and here are the results:
Well, I tried with 3 different browsers to drop a comment there, but it proved impossible :P Do you have the author's email address? Anyway, here is what I was about to post: ==== Well, when using Nmap against an IP address that proves difficult to OS-detect (like in your NAT box example), you should, instead of submitting the fingerprint or whatever, do an nmap Qscan: It's a new nmap scan that you can use with -sQ. It will let you discover how many boxes are behind the NAT box, and group them. Then, you can use nmap again to only scan the ports that belong to a certain group only, and discover each OS separately. And, you should check out the Nmap Scripting Engine ;) ==== - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica ¿No sabés a dónde ir a comer o tomar algo? Visitá www.vivamoslavida.com.ar LISTA DE CASAMIENTO: Cualquier Fravega a nombre de Busleiman (37520). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFkzfBAlpOsGhXcE0RAvEVAJ9rT7sbWfQ1DhoHU33EuKFZptYXwQCfYNl8 sOhaq0Gfzsxtp4c3eXOzWXc= =tHdR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark GomoR (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Dec 27)
- RE: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Sina Bahram (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark DePriest, Jason R. (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 28)
- RE: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Sina Bahram (Dec 27)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark doug (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark doug (Dec 28)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark Hans Nilsson (Dec 29)
- Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark GomoR (Dec 28)