Re: XML libraries, anyone?

["Adriano Monteiro" <py.adriano () gmail com>]

Disagree about minidom. If we're talking about python, sax is the
better solution for large XML files.

On 6/27/06, Satanic.Brain <Satanic.brain () gmail com> wrote:
> Minidom library, in Python and Perl
>
> :)
>
> Joshua D. Abraham wrote:
> > On 26.Jun.2006 07:24PM -0700, stripe dog wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hey everybody,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for recommendations for a small xml parsing library that
> > > can handle large files (as the nmap xml output files can be large when
> > > a large network is scanned), and is licensed under BSD or LGPL.
> > >
> > > Any personal favorites? Any stinkers to avoid?
> > >
> > > I can do all sorts of searches and research on my own, what I am
> > > looking for is personal experience (either first hand hearsay;-) with
> > > any of the popular open source libraries.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Cole
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> > > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> >
> > What language are you planning on using?
> >
> > I know Perl has Nmap::Parser, which is really good.
> >
> > --Josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev


-- 
Adriano Monteiro Marques
http://umit.sourceforge.net
py.adriano () gmail com

"Free software is a matter of liberty not price."
(PYTHON powered)


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev