Re: SoC: port state reasons

["Eddie Bell" <ejlbell () gmail com>]

On 10/06/06, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
> Great points.  In fact, I'm starting to worry that even showing the
> ttl in verbose mode may clutter things up too much.  How about just
> placing the ttl in the XML output for now.  Afterward, someone could
> potentially write the code to look for discrepancies where the TTL
> response differs between ports, then print a notice to normal output
> in that case.


Agreed, the ttl output combined with reasons and IP addresses overwhelms
the output.

I tend to think that we should probably print the
> reason information to the XML output even if --reason wasn't
> specified, as it shouldn't take much more computation or inflate the
> filesize dramatically.


Thats good because a lot of the reason code assignments are not
worth doing conditionally, so get executed even if --reason is not
specified

- eddie


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev