Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages
From: mgrd <subscriptions () gerdau freeshell org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 01:15:27 +0100
Nils Magnus wrote:
Craig Humphrey wrote:
[..]
Is there anything between your scanning host and the target host? E.g. routers, firewalls, etc, which might filter out invalid/spoofed traffic.Both hosts are directly connected to the internet, using a dsl and a analog modem resp., no routers etc.On both machines the firewall was down (`iptables -F').Could you give some more detailed information about that set-up? Have both systems (target and source) official IP addresses? Are both part of the same DSL provider? A lot DSP and cable modem providers do a lot of nasty filtering of traffic they don't rate as appropriate from a leaf node such as a DSL client.
Hmm, hard to say except: - both systems have public/official IP addresses - using different providers (target: dsl ; source: analog-dialup) I think I'll run the same on a local network on the same segment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Craig Humphrey (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages Nils Magnus (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Craig Humphrey (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Gary Bunker (Dec 14)