Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages
From: mgrd <subscriptions () gerdau freeshell org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 01:00:06 +0100
As I corrected, ofcourse I meant `traceroute' Craig Humphrey wrote:
I don't think 'traceroute' is going to tell you what packets made it to the target... 'tcpdump' perhaps? Or Ethereal? (or some other network sniffer).
Righ, I corrected the typo already..
Is there anything between your scanning host and the target host? E.g. routers, firewalls, etc, which might filter out invalid/spoofed traffic.
Both hosts are directly connected to the internet, using a dsl and a analog modem resp., no routers etc.
On both machines the firewall was down (`iptables -F'). ---------------------------------------------------------------------For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Craig Humphrey (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages Nils Magnus (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- Re: decoy scan: no decoy packages mgrd (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Craig Humphrey (Dec 13)
- RE: decoy scan: no decoy packages Gary Bunker (Dec 14)