Re: path inspection

[Florin Andrei <florin () sgi com>]

On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:56, testic wrote:
> I think thats a good idea, although when scanning there will most likely be
> an awful lot of 'closed' ports so you would have to specify which port to
> use to measure the distance of dropped packets. Perhaps an option similar
> to -p where you can specify a range of ports to test, as indeed it may be
> the case where different service are dropped at different machines.

Yes, definitely, this thing makes sense only when inspecting a very
reduced range of ports, or perhaps even only on a single port.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org