Nmap Development mailing list archives
path inspection
From: "testic" <testic () testic demon co uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:56:16 -0000
I think thats a good idea, although when scanning there will most likely be an awful lot of 'closed' ports so you would have to specify which port to use to measure the distance of dropped packets. Perhaps an option similar to -p where you can specify a range of ports to test, as indeed it may be the case where different service are dropped at different machines. Also, this technique could be used for 'open' and 'filtered' ports also, it may be that you could reveal different machines behind a gateway perhaps. The distance to the service could be displayed in the summary next to the service name/port number. http://www.testic.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection phaseone (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- path inspection testic (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Florin Andrei (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection Max (Oct 31)
- Re: path inspection phaseone (Oct 31)