Nmap Announce mailing list archives
Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court
From: Philip Ehrens <pehrens () ligo caltech edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:09:57 -0700
We seem to have gotten back on the legal hobbyhorse again. Since we are programmers, and not lawyers; and since we are all better off when litigations are kept to a minimum, and are applied in the pursuit of real criminals; aren't we way ahead when we apply our own talents to fixing security flaws instead of spending our money on lawyers? I realise this reflects a downright un-american attitude... -- Phil Ehrens <pehrens () ligo caltech edu>| Fun stuff: The LIGO Laboratory, MS 18-34 | http://www.ralphmag.org California Institute of Technology | http://www.yellow5.com 1200 East California Blvd. | ftp://ftp.no.pgpi.com/pub/pgp Pasadena, CA 91125 USA | http://slashdot.org Phone:(626)395-8518 Fax:(626)793-9744 | http://freshmeat.net
Current thread:
- decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Ken Williams (Apr 10)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Sebastian (Apr 10)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Andreas Bogk (Apr 11)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court David Pick (Apr 10)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Adam Shostack (Apr 10)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Ron Hale (Apr 12)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Philip Ehrens (Apr 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Meritt, Jim (Apr 12)
- Re: decoy traffic and legal admissibility of logs in court Sebastian (Apr 10)