nanog mailing list archives

RE: Akamai AANP minimum traffic?


From: John Stitt <jstitt () hop-electric com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:46:38 +0000

I can't speak with authority since I'm not with Akamai, but I requested a cache maybe a year or so ago. At the time I 
was told they were moving away from caching unless you were doing well over 100Gbps consistently, just due to the 
massive scale of their data not lending itself well to caching in smaller installs. Their cache hit percentages were 
getting lower all the time.

They were really pushing for doing PNI or hitting them over an IXP instead.

It's possible something has changed though, just wanted to throw my experience out in case it helps.  Can't hurt to 
reach out and make a request and see what they tell you directly. I got a response pretty quickly and they were nice 
about it.

John Stitt

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jstitt=hop-electric.com () nanog org> On Behalf Of Tom Samplonius
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 12:29 PM
To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Akamai AANP minimum traffic?

[You don't often get email from tom () samplonius org. Learn why this is important at 
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

  Does anyone know what the minimum traffic is to qualify for an Akamai AANP cache?



Tom

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you 
recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are not expecting this message contact the sender directly 
via phone/text to verify.


Current thread: