nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 uptake
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:10:56 +0000
Michael Thomas wrote on 18/02/2024 20:56:
That's really great to hear. Of course there is still the problem with CPE that doesn't speak v6, but that's not their fault and gives some reason to use their CPE.
Already solved: cable modem ipv6 support is usually also excellent, both in terms of subscriber services handoff and management. The requirements for ipv6 support are very clearly defined in the cablelabs docsis 3.0 specification.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Ryan Hamel (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Brandon Butterworth (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Greg Skinner via NANOG (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake John Levine (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) John Levine (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) John R. Levine (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 16)