nanog mailing list archives

Re: Pulling of Network Maps


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 06:53:51 -0500 (CDT)

and I get how that could be. We had a design. Gave the prints to the contractors. Someone internally verified the 
contractors built what was on the prints. A year or two goes by and some laterals ended up costing more because 
handholes on the prints were never built. Our locator goes to a handhole to send his signal and the handhole doesn't 
exist or finds a handhole in a spot not on the prints. Always fun managing OSP. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us> 
To: "Tom Beecher" <beecher () beecher cc> 
Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net>, "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2023 12:33:25 PM 
Subject: Re: Pulling of Network Maps 

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:01 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote: 
My experience with maps over the last decade tells me that even most vendors don't actually know where they are. :) 

So true. And not that young a problem. I leased some dark fiber more 
than a decade ago. They sent an unexpectedly expensive build proposal 
to connect my building. I asked: "Why are you trenching to the manhole 
down the street instead of the one right outside?" They asked, "what 
manhole?" Long story short, they dispatched a guy who popped the 
cover, pumped the water out of the vault and confirmed that they had a 
location they didn't know about. 

Regards, 
Bill Herrin 


-- 
William Herrin 
bill () herrin us 
https://bill.herrin.us/ 


Current thread: