nanog mailing list archives
Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild
From: "Dobbins, Roland via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 02:34:21 +0000
On 11 Oct 2023, at 01:50, Adam Thompson <athompson () merlin mb ca> wrote: you need to buy a moderately-expensive hardware server (they don’t let you virtualize it) To clarify, Sightline has supported virtualization for many years, FYI. I’m not aware of any anti-DDoS products at ISP scale that aren’t SFlow + Flowspec, possibly including “scrubbing” (diverter box); I don’t know if it’s an in-band appliance, or a “scrubber”-on-a-stick In addition to flow telemetry, D/RTBH, S/RTBH, and flowspec, Sightline/TMS supports intelligent DDoS mitigation directly in-line or via diversion/reinjection. [Full disclosure: I am an employee of NETSCOUT.]
Current thread:
- FastNetMon Usage in the wild Javier Gutierrez (Oct 07)
- RE: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Adam Thompson (Oct 10)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Dobbins, Roland via NANOG (Oct 10)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Mark Tinka (Oct 10)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Adam Thompson (Oct 18)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Mirai Azayaka (Oct 18)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Dobbins, Roland via NANOG (Oct 18)
- Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Dobbins, Roland via NANOG (Oct 10)
- RE: FastNetMon Usage in the wild Adam Thompson (Oct 10)