nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routed optical networks
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 06:40:27 +0200
On 5/4/23 15:03, Jared Mauch wrote:
I’m a bit shocked that I now need a 288F cable on some of my routes to support future expansion, but that fiber cost is still small compared to the labor.
Yes, labour is generally the cost. And then way-leaves add cost in terms of time and lost opportunities. Mark.
Current thread:
- RE: Routed optical networks, (continued)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 03)
- Message not available
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 03)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 03)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mike Hammett (May 05)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Denis Fondras (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Jared Mauch (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 04)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 04)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Ge DUPIN (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 04)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mike Hammett (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Mark Tinka (May 05)
- Re: Routed optical networks Tom Beecher (May 04)
- RE: Routed optical networks Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (May 04)