nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment

From: "Lancheng Qin" <qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:54:12 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Thank you. I've heard similar feedback from several other network operators. It seems that this is one of the main 
reasons why some networks do not apply rov at customer interfaces.

Best,
Lancheng


&gt; -----原始邮件-----
&gt; 发件人: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>
&gt; 发送时间: 2023-05-23 21:45:13 (星期二)
&gt; 收件人: "Lancheng Qin" <qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn>
&gt; 抄送: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
&gt; 主题: Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; some ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial
&gt; &gt; interfaces (e.g., provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer
&gt; &gt; interfaces).
&gt; 
&gt; i have heard it said that "my customer pays me to propagate their
&gt; announcement, so i do not apply rov.  let my peers filter it."
&gt; 
&gt; randy
</nanog () nanog org></qlc19 () mails tsinghua edu cn></randy () psg com>

Current thread:

Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment Lancheng Qin (May 23)
- Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
  - Re: Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment Lancheng Qin (May 24)